Which browser is more suitable for watching videos? Five mobile browser evaluations

Nowadays, many browser manufacturers are pushing mobile phones to watch movies. Watching videos has become the main function of mobile browsers, and each family claims to be a viewing artifact. But the video function of the mobile browser is mature. Compared with the professional apps such as Youku and Sohu, is the function perfect enough and the user experience? Here, we selected five mainstream browsers such as Cheetah, QQ, Baidu, UC, and 360 for cross-evaluation.

Considering the configuration of the mobile phone and the network conditions, this evaluation no longer tests the speed of viewing, and uses the core indicators of content, download, definition, control, etc. as a reference, and emphasizes the user experience.

Bring your own video player, only 360 does not have

360 mobile browser —— because there is no own video player, 360 can only use the universal card. The biggest problem is that the players are very different and the user experience is poor.

Baidu, UC, QQ browser & mdash; & mdash; all three have their own players, but the function is relatively thin, the general user experience, while Baidu need to first download the video plug-in to see films.

cheetah browser & mdash; & mdash; cheetahs have more personality, sense of design with functionality are strong.

Summary:

From a functional point of view, UC, QQ, Baidu can basically meet the needs of users, cheetah emphasis on texture and sense of design and functionality of both. In the future, the built-in player is standard on mainstream mobile browsers, and users will be more inclined to feature products.

Sharpness Selection

Cheetah Browser —— Supports ultra-clear playback and intelligent matching of sharpness. When watching a film with a cheetah, the definition defaults to standard definition, which is obviously due to the consideration of mobile phone traffic, while providing ultra-clear and considerate users.

UC browser & mdash; & mdash; default sheet format definition provided by the source, can not provide clarity select

QQ browser & mdash; & mdash; mostly smooth format The rest is HD and does not support ultra clear.

Baidu browser & mdash; & mdash; not provide a definition selection, default resolution sources provided.

360 browser & mdash; & mdash; there is a definition selection, but not super clear.

Summary:

clarity is a big problem, considering the phone to see the piece of visual perception is worse than the computer, mobile phone has become the definition of choice to see the film Strong guarantee. However, most manufacturers do not use clarity as a breakthrough, and basically what is the source of the film. This can also be understood, after all, there is still a certain technical threshold for clarity, but the Cheetah resolution solution provides a good reference.