Let me talk about the environment first. I have two computers. The desktop is old. It is about 03 years old. It is equipped with Celeron 2.8G/865PE/2G DDR/GF6600. The notebook is a 2008 machine with Core. The T9300/4G DDR2/GF8600M GT currently uses Win7 7600 for both machines and is running well.
I want to talk about the comparison of xp and Win7 from the following three aspects, but I don't want to involve data. After all, this is not a review. The online evaluation has a lot of information, and the various data are actually for ordinary users. There is not much use, mainly from the use of feelings to talk about the two systems.
The first is the hardware configuration, here I want to insert a topic, talk about vista. In fact, Vista's biggest failure is that the configuration requirements are too high. Microsoft has overestimated the user's hardware update speed, especially for Chinese users. Therefore, the low configuration has become the first threshold to block vista. In fact, the configuration is good enough. Vista is also a good system. Win7 configuration requirements are much lower than Vista, slightly higher than xp, it can be said that most of the machines currently in use can be installed and run smoothly. My desktop win7 system score is 3.4, the lowest score item is cpu, because the configuration of this machine, basically will not run any large programs, that is, watching a movie, browsing the web to download things to play ordinary games, just these ordinary For the mission, Win7 can be done very well. The 7600 is much better than the previous versions. Like 71xx and 72xx, the usage feels a lot smoother, including using Office2007. This may be slow. The program is normal, I am a person who does not waste broadband. When I don't use the network, the bandwidth will be filled with emule and BT, and the CPU usage will soar, but the fluency does not change much. . The only drawback is Kaspersky 2010, which will become very slow after installation. 2009 is no problem, 2010 has no problem in the notebook. The anti-virus software used today is Microsoft's mse, which is basically good. From the perspective of hardware configuration, Win7 and XP are basically the same. For some machines with lower configuration, they can run smoothly. My current Aero effect is open. If it is closed, it should be better. For some machines with a particularly low configuration, xp still has advantages. Like the P3+265 machine, let's not say how many machines are available now. Even if it hits XP, it can run. It is afraid that it is It’s hard to watch a movie that’s so clear, and it’s as slow as a cow, and it’s of no practical value.
Secondly in terms of compatibility, for hardware compatibility, I have repeatedly emphasized in previous articles that Win7 is the best hardware compatibility in the operating system I have seen. Most hardware can be Correct identification, installation of the driver and then use, this is very valuable, for ordinary users, the driver is even high-tech, eliminating the need to install the driver can let more people use win7, even if xp also do Not enough. With win7, installing the system becomes a simple and enjoyable thing, and the installation speed of Win7 is amazing. For 10 minutes, the process does not need to participate, it is very user-friendly, and there is no way to compare with the 3-4 minute ghost. However, I believe that the Huaxia people with infinite wisdom will soon come up with Ghost's win7 potato garden. There will be a lot of lightness, and there will be win7 in 3-4 minutes. For the compatibility of software, with the increase of win7 market share, many software vendors have updated their own product versions to launch a new version of support 7, and some of the software in the previous versions have been improved. Two good examples like Daemon Tools and Fetion. I haven't found any programs that I can't use at all in Win7. Even some old programs and games can be run by changing compatibility, and I found that xp sp2 mode has the best compatibility, higher than xp3 and Vista. .
As for stability, you can be responsible for it. Using Win7 to include those early versions for more than half a year, there has not been a blue screen, and the number of crashes can be counted with one hand. There are not many crashes of programs, such as IE, QQ, Maxthon, which are very easy to crash in XP, and the number of crashes in Win7 is very very small. There is an old saying called by the insufficiency of luxury, from luxury to martyrdom, one of the things I used to do was to reduce vitsa to xp, including my notebook, from the United States, the first thing is to put the genuine Vista grid Off, install a xp, but using win7 for a long time, have not thought about reducing win7 to xp, the other win7 users around are also mostly, because Win7 is better than xp.
A lot of people used Win7 and said that they are not used to it, the taskbar, my documentation, the control panel is not used to it, many things can not be found. This is a normal reaction to migrating from one thing to another. I upgraded from Office 2003 to 2007. I have had a long transition period. Many things don’t know where and it will be used. Sometimes I have to Baidu. When you write something, you won't use Word. I have a friend who used Sony Ericsson's mobile phone for a long time. I changed a Nokia a few days ago. I started to complain that I was not used to it. I didn't get used to it. After using it for a while, I used it very well. This is old and new. A normal phenomenon of alternating things, and xp has nothing to do with win7 itself. I just felt like this when I used vista, and there are a lot of settings that I don't understand very well. It feels like complicated things. The network and sharing center is not as convenient as xp. Compared with win7, vista is more like a transitional product. Just like Win7, which is not fully developed, Microsoft has already invested in the market early. As a result, some people even use vista to compare with win me. It is said that Microsoft's most garbage-free operating system in history, this is a bit over, Vista has not rotten to the extent of win me.
In short, my point is to support the transition from xp to Win7. From a normal user's point of view, this will be a trend, although xp has been serving us for 8 years, and I have a lot with xp. Deep feelings, but there is no banquet in the world, XP is the time to give way.
No matter how powerful your computer configuration is, even if you use the latest Windows7 system th
Many peoples computers are now win7 systems. After using it for a while, there will always be some m
At present, the most popular Win7 has a much larger memory footprint than the previous XP system. Ma
This title sounds a bit smack, because the title contains too few words, Xiaobian pondering for a lo
XP+Windows 7 dual system MAS DOS V7.1 perfect backup
Win 7 system game screen appears black edge solution
Those well-known Win7 boot items
Repair hard drive icon that the system cannot display
Solve the problem of win7 boot menu garbled
Win 7 practical skills two tricks Let the hard drive light no longer flash
Self-test USB device solves the problem that the interface cannot be used
How to retrieve the quick launch bar in Windows 7
Win7 Home Edition how to upgrade the flagship version Super simple method
Log in to the system as the system account to delete files
Windows 7 comes with a decoder that supports super-multi format
Win 7 under IE8 online banking can not log in Win 7 IE8 landing online banking method
How to restore the IE icon to the desktop after the Win8/8.1 system is installed?
Win10 Build 10134 China Home Edition Upgrade Professional Edition process screenshot exposure
Dell pre-empts Win XP pre-installed
Set win7 to let the computer exit without saving the traces of setting
Introduce a few tricks to speed up the memory running speed
Win10 new preview before push User feedback suggestions are deleted