Vista's current dilemma 5 reasons

Although Microsoft extended the deadline for providing Windows XP licenses to PC manufacturers for six months, this has little impact on corporate IT, as volume licensing agreements will allow IT will continue to install Windows XP for many years to come, but Microsoft's move to extend the XP supply agreement is another sign of Vista's failure. The public reputation of Windows Vista is described as "a mess". Most IT departments have not considered using the Vista operating system. According to market research firm Forrester, as of June this year (the 18th month after the launch of Vista), only 8.8% of corporate computers worldwide are running Vista. At the same time, Microsoft seems to have put the development of Windows 7 on the agenda, promised to release the next generation operating system in 2010. These provide the IT department with ample reason to cross Vista and "focus" on the release of the next-generation operating system, Windows 7. So, what is the cause of Vista's current dilemma? Let's take a look at the top 5 reasons why Vista failed. 5. Apple's successful demonization of Vista's "I'm a Mac series of advertising can not be said to be a very smart idea, not only successfully promoted their own products, but also instilled in individual users." Thought: Windows Vista has many vulnerabilities, consumes resources, and is easy to use. After enduring Apple’s two-year attack, Microsoft recently took a counter-attack measure and launched the “I’m a PC” series of ads to defend the Windows operating system. Although this move has the potential to restore the Windows brand as a whole, it is difficult to save Vista's decline. 4. Windows XP has a deep-rooted impact on people. According to IDC statistics, when Windows XP was released in 2001, there were about 6 million computers in the world using Windows XP. More than 80% of PCs were running Windows, but they were divided into two camps: Windows 95/98. (65%) and Windows NT/2000 (26%). One of the great goals of Windows XP is to integrate the codebases of Windows 9x and Windows NT, and Windows XP has finally done this. In 2008, there were 1.1 billion computers in use around the world, and more than 70% of the computers were running the Windows XP operating system. This means that nearly 800 million computers are running Windows XP, making it the most widely installed operating system. Therefore, it is very difficult to eliminate the impact of Windows XP on users, especially for IT departments that deploy and integrate applications around Windows XP. And, whether you believe it or not, Windows XP will actually expand its market share in the next few years. why? In the next few years, low-cost portable laptops and netbooks will flood the market. Although these inexpensive machines are enough to provide users with a comfortable online experience, for most users, they do not have enough resources to run Windows Vista, so they have to choose to use Windows XP or Linux. Intel expects that the portable notebook and netbook market will grow rapidly in the coming year.
3.Vista is too slow For many years, many developers and IT professionals have accused Microsoft of "software surplus" -- adding too many changes and features to the software to make the software huge and bloated. However, this does not seem to have much negative impact on Microsoft's software sales. However, for Windows Vista, the "software surplus" ill has finally broken out. Vista has more than 50 million lines of code, and XP has only 35 million lines when it was released. After many upgrades, the amount of XP code is only 40 million lines. "Software bloat" has severely slowed Windows Vista's speed, especially when it's running on older hardware devices. Even so, the latest version of Windows XP is faster than the latest version of Vista. If a new computer is slower than the old one, who is the reason? 2. There shouldn't be Vista. Many people may have forgotten. When Microsoft first introduced Windows XP, it actually wanted to change the business model of its operating system--from traditional package software to ordering software. And transform all users into subscribers. That's why Microsoft gave up the naming conventions that Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows 2000 have been using, and chose Windows XP as the name of the operating system. At the time, "XP" represented "experience" and was part of the Microsoft .Net Web services strategy. Microsoft's overall plan is to let users and businesses pay for the "Windows Experience" for a year - as long as you pay the usage fee, you can not only use XP, but also get all software upgrades and updates. Of course, if you don't continue to pay, Windows XP installed on your computer will be disabled. This is why Windows XP comes with product activation. In 2001, Microsoft released both Windows XP and Office XP products, and this product includes product activation features, which are expected to eventually migrate to the ordering product. However, by the end of 2001, Microsoft had abandoned the concept of ordering Office products, and Windows XP and Office XP quickly returned to the traditional product development model of the business model of the packaged software. The idea of ​​using incremental release and upgrades for software products -- rather than releasing a major package every three or five years -- is a good concept. Microsoft just can't figure out how to make this business model work. After a short trial, Microsoft took the easiest way to overcome this problem - returning to the traditional mode, and this model and the current IT field The economic and technical reality has not matched.
1.Vista compatibility is too bad One of the main reasons why Windows XP is so popular is that it absorbs the hardware, software and driver compatibility of the Windows 9x product line, and has the stability of Windows NT products first. Sexual and industrial applicability. Compatibility issues are a big issue. A single, highly compatible Windows platform greatly simplifies the computing experience for users, IT departments, and software hardware vendors. When Microsoft released Windows Vista, it may have forgotten or ignored the compatibility issue, because although Vista experienced a long trial period, it was still with many existing software and hardware when it was officially released in January 2007. compatible. Since many important programs and peripherals cannot be used in the Vista environment, this makes it impossible for many IT departments to use it. The vast majority of Vista's incompatibility issues are due to Microsoft's excessive pursuit of so-called system security. At the beginning of 2000, Windows suffered a series of viruses, worms and malware, and Microsoft began a so-called Trustworthy Computing program to make its products more secure. One of the results of this program is Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), which has earned the trust of IT departments and paved the way for XP to become the world's most deployed operating system. Another major achievement of the Trustworthy Computing program is Vista's security mechanism. There is no doubt that Windows Vista can be regarded as the most secure operating system released by Microsoft so far, but the "cost" is also expensive. Not only are some features very cumbersome, but many basic tasks are accompanied by annoying security tips such as UAC. It also brings a series of software incompatibility issues. In other words, Vista has given up a lot of common practices for users in XP. Summary Some people think that Vista's actual penetration rate is higher than XP after its release, and Vista will eventually replace XP's position in the enterprise. I disagree with this view. There are very good reasons for users to migrate from Windows 9x or Windows NT/2000 to XP: Windows 9x users expect a more stable and secure operating system, while Windows NT/2000 users want better hardware and Software compatibility. Moreover, updating all machines to XP will also simplify the complexity of system maintenance. And from XP to Vista, there is no fundamental driver. Security is not a big problem, because the security and stability of XP SP2 (or higher) is already very high, and most IT departments are quite good. Microsoft needs to abandon the strategy of launching a new operating system every 3-5 years. Instead, it insists on using a version of Windows to regularly release version updates, patches, and new work. Most IT departments have basically established a subscription model with Microsoft, and such a business strategy is already in place. If the user does not pay the subscription fee, their operating system cannot be upgraded further and should not disable the Windows user's computer. Microsoft can also work with original equipment manufacturers to install an operating system with a lifespan on each new computer, such as three years. If this period is exceeded, the user will have to pay the fee if he wants to upgrade the system. Of course, he can choose not to upgrade.