If your Windows Vista operating system is installed, the system becomes slower and slower? Let us analyze it for you. 1, the registry has become more bloated. The impact of the registry on the speed of the system, a bit unclear. Microsoft designed the registry to give the application a place to store configuration information. Because the registry is loaded at system startup, the application uses registry keys faster than external configuration files when it starts. But if the registry is too large, it will consume a lot of system resources, why there are so many registry cleaning software, because the registry garbage is too much, not only the application software to create registry garbage, Windows itself also creates registry garbage. In the software for making registry garbage, Microsoft's software should be among the best. For example, Office and .NET Framework are all software that writes a large number of registrations. The Windows Vista registry is estimated to be at least twice as swollen as Windows XP. 2, pre-installed more fonts Windows XP/2003 only pre-installed about 60 kinds of TrueType fonts, to Windows Vista, actually reached 190 kinds, the number has more than tripled, we should know, system installation The more fonts you have, the more you affect the speed. According to the test of this article, 100 fonts are installed, the system delay is increased by 5.33 seconds, and Windows Vista pre-installs more than 190 fonts, so the system startup speed will increase by nearly 10 seconds. And the question is, do we need these fonts? Do we need to write documents in these fonts? Do we need to use them for design? Basically it is not needed. What is Microsoft's so-called Yahei font, which claims to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, a word of 100 dollars, plagiarize Mac OSX, is only effective, Windows Vista interface, still so ugly, and Mac OSX is simply no match. What's even more hilarious is that there is a case where a font in Windows Vista has a missing word. 3, bundled with more than one .NET runtime environment This thing is a speed killer, and is not required by the average user. Everyone who knows software development knows that .NET is good for web applications, but if it is used for desktop applications, it is not good. It is too slow. Users can't stand a slow start at startup. The delay is too long. So far, desktop applications developed with .NET are still rare. Just like Microsoft, they don't dare to use it as the main development tool for Office. At most, they only use .NET on some small functions. The awful thing about .NET is that it is tightly integrated with the system, so it affects the speed of the operating system. First of all, it wrote too many registry entries at the time of installation, at least tens of thousands. The second point is that it loads a lot of DLLs when Windows starts. In order to create a fast image of .NET, Microsoft preloads .NET DLLs (like Office) when Windows starts. Moreover, Windows Vista is not only pre-installed with a .NET runtime environment. Do not believe that you go to the C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFramework directory to see, there are several directories named with the version number. In contrast, .NET's rival Java is not the case. On the Windows platform, it only registers a small number of DLLs and does not load at system startup. On non-Windows platforms, Java can also be green software. 4, the use of more complex, fancy interface technology Windows Vista uses the so-called Aero, Flip 3D interface technology, but unfortunately these things can not bring convenience to users, and the design is not excellent, even ugly. The most damn thing is that they consume a lot of system resources. Microsoft's interface technology is also effective, and the more effective it is, the more disgusting. I didn't expect Microsoft's conservative follower company to dare to make the taskbar and title bar black, the menu bar is cyan, the control buttons are different in size, and the size is enlarged and flat. This design seems to be Very bold and creative, but it is not difficult to find that this design is very ugly. If Mac OSX is as beautiful as crystal, then Windows Vista looks like ugly plastic and burlap, knowing that the Mac OSX interface was designed six years ago. Microsoft's East effect is the end of the effect, this time the icon is also big, but those icons in addition to bringing system garbage, what is the use, who should use your big icon, then look at the shell32.dll inside, the new icon The old icons are in a piece, which is so uncoordinated. What Aero, Flip 3D, is not only visual waste, but also system garbage.