There are often netizens asking me to ask: Open Microsoft Windows system automatic update will be deleted by Microsoft "black"? Why use third-party software & ldquo; patching rdquo; more than the classmates through the system update to patch more? Which third party is used? “Patch” software is the fastest and most insurance? From the first question to the Nth question last night, my answer is the same. It is not to maintain the identity of the answer to the same question, but the objective facts can only be and must be answered in this way. The following texts are my comprehensive answers to such questions —— Kaibo for nearly four years, from Windows XP to Windows Vista to today's Windows 7, I have not seen any users because of the system update was "black" & rdquo; help message. Long-term practice shows that turning on automatic system update will not pose any impact on the normal operation of the operating system. In other words: only benefits, no harm. Even the "WGA" and "Activation Technology" controls that make some users tremble with fear will not bring the bad luck of "black" unless installed. The original source: "WGA" and "Activation Technology" control will not "automatic" update, regardless of download or installation before the user consent. The third-party “patching” software has many styles and is becoming more and more popular. It is the software developers who have seized the fear of “black” and found a shortcut to promote the development of self-development. Playing ghosts with the help of Zhong Rong). Adding “ patching to the software will undoubtedly greatly increase the user's installation utilization rate, thereby occupying the market and expanding the software market share. So why use third-party software & ldquo; patching rdquo; more than system updates in general? The reason is actually two: one, highlighting more & ldquo; perfect & rdquo;. Second, "integration" has made mistakes. “Patch” & rdquo; The staff behind the software, in the rush to find up and down in the impetuous, for which belong to "must", which belong to "and" can also be "not so skilled." Fortunately, "Han Xin will be a soldier, a lot of good and good", more than always better than less. Some netizens said: He met a third party "Patch" software, and added some irrelevant "patch", which caused the installation to run abnormally. As for whether the third party "patch" is mixed with "rogue", it can't be concluded because it is not analyzed one by one. At the end of the day, only Microsoft knows itself best: Microsoft Windows will determine which "subjects" need to be accepted through system updates (including "must" and "alternative”). In view of this, it is recommended to see this "comprehensive answer" users, although safely open the operating system automatic update, give up the third party "Patch" software "this stick". As for which third party & ldquo; patching & rdquo; software is the fastest and most insurance? Because of the extreme lack of experience in the daily use of such software, it is not good to answer the question about which users are "good", which one is not good? At this point, with the third party "Patch" software said: "offended" you guys!