Real or fake? Netizen 3 strokes to increase system speed

  

Recently, there is a saying on the Internet: "Three strokes to increase your system speed twice", can you really achieve it? Today, the author presents this method to the majority of netizens. Let's take a look at whether this method is really feasible.

This method is white, that is, the implementation of three commands, very simple, the specific implementation steps are as follows:

1. Reduce the boot disk scan waiting time

at the beginning of ”→“Run” enter “chkntfs /t:0” and enter.
Figure 1 Command to reduce boot disk scan wait time

2. Delete system backup file

After various software and hardware installations are completed, Windows XP needs to update files very rarely. It is. Enter “sfc.exe /purgecache” in the "Start" "Start”→“Run>; Enter and delete the system backup file of nearly 300MB.
Figure 2 saves 160MB of space for the system disk

3.Compressed folder

This is a pretty good optimization, Windows XP has built-in support for .ZIP files, we You can view the zip file as a folder. However, the system uses some resources to implement this feature, so disabling this feature can improve system performance. The implementation is very simple, just cancel the registration information of zipfldr.dll. Enter “regsvr32 /u zipfldr.dll.” in "Start”→“Run” and press Enter.

For the feasibility of this method, the majority of netizens also started a positive discussion, all kinds of arguments have been, the author slightly sorted out. For example: good method support, really useful, can really improve twice? After adding hardware, the effect is better, wait and see, impossible, no need to fight for a few seconds, no effect, too exaggerated, try to say … …

It can be seen from the above reply The majority of netizens are still very concerned about the system acceleration problem, and the author is no exception, so I tried it. But the result is that the author is also mixed. I am sure that I can save 160MB of system space, which is a bit of an effect, but it is not about 300MB mentioned in the above method (perhaps depending on the system environment). The effect of the other two is not very obvious.

The author's conclusion is that this method does not increase the speed of the system by 2 times as it is said, and it lacks factual basis. In turn, it can be said that the method is completely based on the Windows operating system, so the function that affects the speed of the system, why should Microsoft load it in the operating system, and not directly remove it in the product development process?

If it is so simple, you can increase the speed of the system. Microsoft does not have to spend so much money and manpower to continuously develop new operating systems to improve system performance, function and speed. Therefore, this method is simply not possible to increase the speed of the system by 2 times. It is completely a matter of course. I don’t know what the majority of netizens mean. We can have a discussion here!

Copyright © Windows knowledge All Rights Reserved