Windows operating system let us develop something stinking

1, crazy refreshing I believe many people are the same as before, once they enter the Windows desktop, they start to refresh wildly. Otherwise it is not fun. In fact, many people who came from Dos, Win3.2 know that the earliest Windows opened a resource manager window, the content displayed is the moment of opening, the files in the directory. Suppose you now use Notepad to save a txt in this directory, which is not visible in the Explorer and must be manually refreshed. This is the origin of the "refresh" function. The reason why XP and Vista, Win7 can be seen, is because they are automatically refreshed at regular intervals. It’s just a crazy refresh. This little trick has been learned by many computer novices and is considered to be a must-have for masters.

Linux Gnome and KDE and Mac OS do not need to be refreshed, nor can they be refreshed. No matter what kind of resource manager tool is used to browse the local directory, no matter what software is used to create or delete files in this directory, It will be displayed in real time without refreshing. Maybe the spray will say: real-time refresh, more waste of system resources. Actually wrong, this is not a real-time refresh, but the file system calls back to the callback function of the resource manager (similar tools, such as the Mac Finder), which is called in the software development industry "observer mode", I think Coder who has learned the design pattern understands? Advanced is advanced, nothing to argue about.

2, Maximize the window

I have seen many people, open the resource manager under Windows, even if there is only one file inside, one of the things to do is to maximize him (click Maximize the button, there are some so-called master double-click on the title bar, and even some shortcut keys er press Alt + space + x). Others, using 21-inch LCD, 1920 * 1080 resolution, browse some web pages with a width of 800, but also maximize the browser, even if the white sides of both sides are wider than the web content. What is the pain? I appreciate the Mac OS's best size button and no maximization design, because I used to have the biggest stink, and now I've turned back to shore.

3, just bought the hard disk (or just bought a new computer) the first pre-partition

Like everyone, my previous PC also has a partition, C disk installed system, D disk installed software E disk is the installation program and iso, F disk video music, G disk is the document and work files. It seems to be in good order, and there is no fear that the system will lose important files after reinstalling the system.

But looking back and thinking, have we gone the wrong way at the beginning?

If you want the files to be organized, the program is placed in the /Application directory, the movie is placed in the ~/Movie directory, the music is placed in the ~/Music directory, and the files are placed in the ~/Document directory. Isn't it very neat? Why is the reinstallation of the system file lost? Is this not because of a problem with the operating system design? Going deeper into a phase, why reinstall the system? I bought a TV. Because I watched an unclean TV station, the TV would need to reinstall the system. I bought a refrigerator. Because of the deterioration of the hair that has been put in, the refrigerator is smashed. Do I need to reinstall the system?

Under Mac, reinstalling the system will not lose personal files. Unless you are handcuffed, you have to find a hidden deep "scraping" In addition, my macbook has been used for a year and has never been reloaded. Why should I reload it? Where is he sorry for me?

Remember that I used to brush Slic's BIOS, but never activated Windows, why? Because I can't use the system for 30 days. Now, finally liberated.

4, the two acquaintances met and asked: Hey buddy, what good anti-virus software?

The topic of old talk. Some people now say that Linux and Mac viruses are less because of fewer users, and hackers do not bother to develop viruses. I am asking you to study the operating system principle a little bit and say goodbye, don't be fooled. Under Windows, developing a virus is too simple. The easiest way to write a batch del c:ntldr, the system will be paralyzed after execution, although it is easy to recover, but he is too vulnerable.

Remember a classic vulnerability in Win2000? In the interface that needs to press Ctrl+Alt+Del to log in, click Help, and then in the help: File-Open, you can access the system files. What does this mean? All security systems are a layer of GUI shells, which are paper tigers. There is no file system level protection at all. Just like a web application, the administrator account password is written in a Javascript script.

Under Linux and Mac, if you don’t catch a loophole in a particular version of the software, it’s impossible to write a virus. It’s impossible to start. Several of the few viruses in history have been effective for specific versions. And I want to stay in those versions of the user, may have been buried in peace.

There is an example of a car here. PC+Windows is like an old van. The wires are bare under the dashboard. If a naughty child pulls off one, the car will be finished. Although the eye-catching is easy to repair, if the newbie is wrong, then the entire car circuit system will be finished. The Mac series is like a family car, not a violent means, and I want to break it.

========== At the end of the day, I have to admit that every version of Windows is improving. But how can some Windows users not open up? Win7 finally learned the Mac OS Dock-style taskbar, but many people just installed Win7 to adjust the taskbar to the original classic style.

It is not a shame to open a van to work. The shameful thing is: to drive a van to work for others for a lifetime, not to be motivated, but to laugh at the people in the middle and high-class cars, and to have money to burn.